The Torch: 'Forget the Silly "Anti-War" Parades. Put The Afghan People First.'

Terry Glavin once again puts things in, er, perspective (via Northtea, at a very good comment here):

From Lauryn Oates, co-founder of the Canada Afghanistan Solidarity Committee, in today's [March 14] Globe and Mail:

"If we do not urgently refocus our debate and put the needs and interests of Afghans at the heart of our discussions, we will leave a bleak smear in the Canadian history of international interventionism, a smear that will bring us shame in the history books our children will read. We must ensure that we are finding constructive solutions to the underlying problems plaguing Afghanistan and to the issues that Afghans point to as priorities, and not merely to our own insular interests. We have limited time to start making a genuine effort to understand Afghanistan, its history and its people, and to recapture what we have lost of our identity as humanitarians and peace-builders."

And a press release from Canadian Women for Women in Afghanistan:

"Troops Out" is Pro-War

With the organized ‘anti-war’ rallies planned this weekend across Canada, there are many Canadians who consider themselves peace activists who share a different view.

“I do not agree with the 'troops out' position," says Janis Rapchuk, board member of the Calgary-based volunteer organization, Canadian Women for Women in Afghanistan.

“I’m a peace activist and have spent years volunteering my time on a daily basis in what could be called ‘living activism.’ That is, our activism is aimed towards a sustainable peace in Afghanistan. Marching on the streets may give voice to one group of organized individuals, with a set agenda like the TROOPS-OUT position, but it does not provide space for good dialogue and discussions that can help Canadians understand how we can influence change and provide sustainable alternatives to war”, says Rapchuk.

Her organization raises awareness and funds to advance and protect human rights for Afghan women and girls. “It is important to learn about the complexities of these issues. If you don’t like the role Canada has in Afghanistan, then lobby for change but be sure that your actions are based on what is best for the people of Afghanistan, if you truly believe in ending war, ” says Rapchuk.

“From our perspective, a troop withdrawal would mean a very bloody civil war with no end in sight--an assessment in line with the United Nations. This is a very emotional issue for Canadians, and rightfully so given the millions of lives at risk, both Afghan and Canadian. We, as Canadians, have a very important role working in partnership with the Afghan people. The majority of Afghans want us there and want to work towards building a peaceful Afghanistan with those who truly have this as their goal. We see this troops-out position as, in fact PRO-WAR!," says Rapchuk.

A related comment thread at Milnet.ca:

I guess democracy doesn't work...protests on Afghan mission.

Update: For a sample of the "progressive" views Mr Glavin deprecates, see the comments here:

not in my name

Upperdate: Just to annoy Cameron, here are the results of the Nov. 15 CTV online poll as of 2215 EDT:

There are protests this weekend demanding an end to the military mission in Afghanistan. What do you think should happen next?

Stay the course 4832 votes (61 %)
End combat role in Kandahar 1462 votes (18 %)
Withdraw completely 1632 votes (21 %)

Total Votes: 7926

Will this trend continue (unlike in an earlier Globe poll)?

Answer: Yes. Amazingly, as of 1000 EDT March 16, the percentages are unchanged (does make one wonder about the remarkable turn-around in the Globe poll):