Thursday, March 13, 2008

World-wide C-130J update

A useful article from Defense Industry Daily (h/t to GAP):
The C-130J “Super Hercules” Hercules program has been the focus of a great deal of controversy – and recently, of a full program restructuring. Most American planes rely on the US market as their base, and then seek exports, but the privately-developed C-130J was different. Australia, Britain, Denmark, and Italy were all ahead of the curve, and have been operating the privately-developed C-130J for several years. By the time the plane finally reached “initial operating capability” for the US military late in 2006, these faster-moving foreign customers were already banding together to create a common upgrade set for their serving fleets. A number of variants are currently flying in transport (C-130J), stretched transport (C-130J-30), aerial broadcaster (EC-130J), coast guard patrol (HC-130J), aerial tanker (KC-130J), and even hurricane hunter weather aircraft (WC-130J).

Canada [emphasis added], India and Norway recently moved to join the global C-130J customer base. In America, meanwhile, some momentum is building. C-130J purchases are taking place under both annual budgets and supplemental wartime funding, in order to replace a US tactical transport fleet that’s flying old aircraft and in dire need of major repairs.

Despite early concerns from critics, the C-130J has demonstrated in-theater performance on the front lines that represents a major improvement over its C-130E/H predecessors. The key question is, does it break the key limitations that have hobbled a number of US Army programs? This DID FOCUS Article describes the C-130J, examines that issue, covers global developments for the C-130J program, and makes note of present and emerging competitors. The latest news includes a delivery to the US Coast Guard, and a maintenance contract from the Marines…
Sorry, you have to pay for the rest of the article. I do wish some Canadian reporters, defence "experts", and politicians would read what is there.

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home