Corrections requested: Military facts/Globe's Sept. 16 edition
A message sent to Globe editors and these reporters (with apologies to Cameron Campbell--see fourth comment):
Dear Editors,The relevant links were typed-out in the message.
Corrections should be made regarding the articles by Bill Curry and Paul Koring, Sept. 16.
1) Mr Curry: "Canada beefs up Afghan war commitment". Mr Curry writes that "The original mission in Kabul saw the Iltis jeeps replaced by LAV III light armoured vehicles when it became clear the jeeps did not provide enough protection for the troops."
Absolutely incorrect. The Iltis were not replaced by the LAVII but by a better jeep-type vehicle, the Mercedes Geländewagen ("G-Wagon").
2) Mr Koring: "U.S. pilot targeted Canadians' trash fire". Mr Koring writes that "A single second's worth of fire from the aircraft's [A-10] gun is able to spew 50 thumb-sized, high-explosive bullets, each of which is powerful enough to rip through armour plate."
The A-10's gun is the AN/GAU-8 30mm Avenger seven-barrel gatling gun.
Far from firing "thumb-sized, high-explosive bullets", it fires "milk-bottle-size rounds". Rather a large difference, one would think.
It is this sort of wildly inaccurate reporting by Canadian journalists on basic military facts that calls into question their ability to report accurately on military matters at all.
3 Comments:
I have no problem with you correcting them.
My problem is that it's so piece meal, you correct a bit, then they blow something else. Then you correct them... it's just all very "thumb in dam" if you ask me.
Hell, a really good briefing book, like the CP style guide would probably do the trick. Nice Smythe binding, mb a bit water proof like the early 90s CP guides were, softcover with rounded corners. Explaining rank, formation sizes, the different weapons and designations etc etc.
The other point that I have is the nit picking, like in the last point, where the facts were all right, but people don't like the tone... it's just pretty juvenile.
Actually, this sort of thing is silly nit-picking. Neither of these are really points of substance.
Post a Comment
<< Home