Monday, September 22, 2008

Liberal platform on defence

This is it. Three pathetically thin paragraphs. Note the lie in the third paragraph.
6. Defence

Canada’s ongoing commitment to the military mission in Afghanistan has depleted our ability to deploy the Canadian Forces elsewhere in the world. When combined with the commitments that will be necessary in order to provide the needed security requirements when Canada welcomes the world to the Vancouver Winter Olympics in 2010, we are severely limited in our ability to offer assistance to other international efforts as they arise. By putting a firm end date on the military deployment in Kandahar, we will regain flexibility with respect to our military to respond to emergency situations both domestically and internationally.

A Liberal government will remain committed to the money allocated in the fiscal framework to the Canadian Forces (CF) over the coming four years [and then? More here.]– much of which was originally committed in the Liberal Budget of 2005. But the job of supporting Canada’s armed forces doesn’t end when our troops return home. Military life, overseas deployments, and dangerous missions take a heavy toll. Our soldiers need adequate support services when they return from overseas or leave the service. A Liberal government will support the current members of the CF and our veterans by establishing a dedicated $60-million fund to help them cope with post-traumatic stress disorder and other ailments. As previously mentioned, a Liberal government will also establish a health ombudsman both within the CF and within Veterans Affairs Canada.

The federal government must also ensure that our forces get the most value for money on military contracts. We will abandon the sole-sourcing approach to defence contracts taken by the Conservatives [so what would they have bought other than C-17s and C-130Js (A400Ms?)--and Ch-47Fs?], ensuring that Canadian industry can compete for contracts while guaranteeing the best equipment at the best price [for the above sort of aircraft? And what if Canadian industry can't do the job even when asked?--more here]. We will also finally act on the purchase of much needed replacements for the fixed-wing search-and-rescue (SAR) planes to replace the current ageing fleet. The previous Liberal government set aside money to make this purchase in 2005 [a lie--the money was budgeted in 2004 and the Liberal government failed to act] but the Conservatives have failed to act. These SAR planes are needed both for the safety of Canadians but also to promote our sovereignty in Canada’s North [Why?]. That is why we will ensure that some of the new fleet of SAR planes are based in the North .
Wow.

6 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

hee's the "fourth" paragraph from the Liberal budget.

"The Liberals will help pay for their plan by cutting about $12-billion over four years from the federal government's $200-billion annual budget and shifting the funds to new priorities."


DND should be afraid, very,very afraid.

5:28 p.m., September 22, 2008  
Blogger holdfast said...

Yay - more LSVWs setting themselves on fire.

This is why anyone who cares about the CF would have to be criminally insane to vote for the Grits. The Torys are far from perfect, but anyone who survived the 1990s should know how bad the Grits will be - especially with Stephanie "Green Shaft" Dion in charge - he would probably take away all the armoured vehicles and replace them with Priuss.

6:32 p.m., September 22, 2008  
Blogger Nick said...

Lets face it. Over the last 40 years, both Tory and Grit govenrments have simply made token gestures towards the CAF. It has been a miracle that we finally have a government who understands the absolute necessity of equipping and maintaining a well rounded and flexible military. While I am not happy about some of the things the Harper gov't has done, [ cancelling the JJS and mid range partol ships as an example ], there is no doubt in my mind that voting anything other than Tory is a virtual death sentence for our armed forces.

8:00 p.m., September 22, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

That the Liberals would gut the DND is a given.

In a recent post I pointed out a clue to this that most seemed to miss.

Putting Dion in charge of protecting our sovereignty would be an utter disaster for Canada. It should scare the hell out of everyone!

9:22 p.m., September 22, 2008  
Blogger Mark, Ottawa said...

springer: To repeat something oft said at this blog: no-one save the Danes has any claim on any Canadian land/land in the North. The areas of dispute are:

1) The status in maritime law of the Northwest Passage;

2) Some areas of the Beaufort Sea as between the US and Canada; and

3) Economic rights to the seabed that are not part of sovereign national territory.

Don't fall prey to meaningless jingoism from any party.

Mark
Ottawa

10:00 p.m., September 22, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

The Liberals say they would not 'single source' for the new aircraft. In other words they wouldn't buy from the Americans. What a wonderful idea! That way when we run into a problem where we need a bunch of spare parts, we can't just go to the U.S. who will have them in-stock since they will still be flying whatever type of aircraft Canada purchases. No, we'll go to our buddies in Europe who won't be able to supply in an emergency, and probably wouldn't anyway if the EU doesn't happen to like whatever mission we are engaged in. You remember our allies in Europe: the same ones who wouldn't even loan us helicopters for Afghanistan. Yea, Liberals!

10:04 p.m., September 22, 2008  

Post a Comment

<< Home