Saturday, August 23, 2008

JSS, Coast Guard patrol vessels: can't afford to build in Canada

Quelle surprise! Back to the drawing board computer, I guess:
The Conservative government has quietly scuttled the navy's $2.9-billion project to replace its aging supply ships, saying bids from the shipbuilding industry were "significantly" higher than the money set aside for the program (more here).

It has also cancelled a tender call for the purchase of 12 mid-shore patrol ships for the coast guard.

The decisions were announced in a statement issued Friday night by Public Works Minister Christian Paradis.

"These vessels are a key priority of the government of Canada," Paradis said in the release.

"However, the government must ensure that Canadian taxpayers receive the best value for their money."

Both National Defence and the Fisheries and Oceans Department are considering "the next steps," Paradis added.

The decision to halt the Joint Support Ship project is a major blow to a navy that is already struggling to keep its existing 1960s vintage replenishment ships — HMCS Preserver and Protecteur — in the water.

The "tankers," as they are known in the navy, are vital to keeping warships supplied with fuel, ammunition, spare parts and supplies during long overseas operations.
Longer lifespan for ships

Both were expected to reach the end of their service life between 2010 and 2012, but Friday's announcement means they'll likely have to remain at sea longer.

The program to acquire three new multi-role ships was announced in Halifax in June 2006 by former defence minister Gordon O'Connor [no--the program started under the Liberals]. The announcement was heralded at the time as the beginning of a new era for the navy.

Almost right from the beginning, the plan ran into trouble as designers tried to incorporate everything into the ships that naval planners had requested.

The ships were expected to function as resupply vessels, cargo carriers for the army, a floating headquarters and possibly a hospital ship, depending upon the mission assigned [Project Management Office Joint Support Ship is here].

Defence sources said the two consortiums that were bidding basically determined the ships could not be built for the amount of money the government had set aside.

The decision is also a blow to the coast guard.

Fisheries Minister Loyola Hearn announced last year that $324 million had been set aside for the purchase and maintenance of six new vessels for the coast guard fleet. The plans included the purchase of 12 new mid-shore patrol vessels.

They were to be used primarily for fisheries conservation and protection duties in the Maritime, Quebec and Pacific regions.

But at least four of the ships were to be tasked for maritime security duties on the St. Lawrence Seaway-Great Lakes system [much more here on the MSPV program--also started by the Liberals; the title of the post was unduly optimistic, links at the Update no longer work, some details on the vessels here].
Heaven knows when we'll get new vessels, of proper capability, as long as governments insist on building in Canada. And what hope is there for the Navy's planned Arctic/Offshore Patrol Vessels?

More at Milnet.ca. Meanwhile David Pugliese of the Ottawa Citizen posts on the government's practice of releasing bad news late Friday.

Update: From an interview with the Minster of Public works and Government Services--scant encouragement here:
...
"Our first wish was to have this procurement to be finalized so that we could go forward. Unfortunately, there is a major budget constraint here, so this is why we had to announce that the procurements are over," Paradis said in an interview.

"We have to make sure that the taxpayers get the most for their dollars."...

"This is our key priority ... since we got into office, that we will give Defence the supplies that they need and the renewal of the coast guard ships," said Paradis. "Fisheries and Oceans and DND (the Department of National Defence) are looking on their side to see what will be the next step ... but for now, the procurement process (is) over."..
How long, oh Lord, how long?...

Upperdate: Our Green Party should be blushing crimson. Yet another howling example of Canadian political opportunism. Helpless, helpless, helpless--our politicians.

2 Comments:

Blogger WE Speak said...

I really wish the Navy would look more to Australia as an example. Their last two replenishment ships were commercial vessels converted for Naval use. When you look at the Australian Navy, they have managed to maintain a balanced, modern fleet with a wide range of capabilities. The key has been the cooperation of the two main parties in Australia coordinating on defence policy. A change of government there doesn't necessitate wholesale changes in defence policy. Leave the politics aside and focus on what's right for the country.

Other than politics, there's no reason why we couldn't purchase ships built in either the US or Europe and then do the final fit-outs in Canada. Focus Canadian shipbuilding efforts on the small to medium size patrol craft of which both the Navy and Coast Guard need plenty.

We should also be seriously investigating the Littoral Ship concept currently being developed by the US. This is exactly the type of capability a small force like Canada requires. Smaller crews (40 to 60) with swappable packages depending on the role required. One of the packages even includes command and control capabilities.

2:48 a.m., August 24, 2008  
Blogger fm said...

Re: Australian tankers. HMAS Sirius is a good ship that came fairly cheap, but she isn't perfect. She is meant to be an interim vessel until proper replacement AORs (for Success and Sirius) can be programmed (probably after the LHDs are built). Sirius is a bit big for an AO and she runs around half empty most of the time and consequently bobs around a bit. Her Helo deck has limitations as a result. But when her time is served you can take the RAS gear off her and sell her as a regular tanker again.

10:32 p.m., August 24, 2008  

Post a Comment

<< Home