Friday, January 25, 2008

What's happening in Pakistan

Further to the "Pakistan" part at the end of this post, and to this story about Defense Secretary Gates himself offering direct US military help to assist the Pakistanis in fighting insurgents and terrorists in the border region, here's an interesting blog post at nationalreviewonline (via J.M. Heinrichs):

War in Waziristan [Stanley Kurtz]

What if there were a major development in the war on terror and nobody paid attention? Well, it would still be a major development in the war on terror. The event in question is a offensive by Pakistan’s army against the Taliban’s haven in South Waziristan. Pakistan’s government is playing this down by merely calling it a move to "reinforce" positions in Waziristan, and by formally denying that an "offensive" has been launched at all. But this rhetoric is pretty clearly designed to prevent a backlash by Pakistan’s many Islamist sympathizers.

The Western media are generally ignoring developments in Waziristan and/or playing them down. For one thing, reporters long ago fled the tribal regions, which in any case were largely closed to outsiders. That gives government bulletins an outsized influence on the press, and the government keeps its reports focused on small specifics — like the killing of a few "miscreants" in some obscure small town which no one in the West has ever heard of. Yet it’s increasingly evident that we are finally seeing a serious move by the Pakistani army against the Islamists’ core refuge in Waziristan.

The best coverage of developments in Waziristan comes from Pakistani sources, which retain connections to private sources in the tribal areas. Here’s a report from Pakistan’s Dawn entitled, "Troops advance with tanks for major assault: Clashes continue in S. Waziristan." Here’s a story from Pakistan’s Nation, "Army launches new operation in SWA" (South Waziristan Agency). Despite the limitations on reporting from this region, the Western press could be saying much more about the Waziristan offensive. Since this story tends to show that Musharraf and Pakistan’s military are in fact fighting terrorism, and since it is a positive development in the war on terror, the media finds this item, shall we say, uninteresting.

Notice also that yesterday, General David Rodriguez, who commands American forces in eastern Afghanistan, said that he did not expect the Taliban to launch its usual yearly offensive in Afghanistan this coming spring. That is a remarkable statement. The press attributes Rodriguez’s comment to the Taliban’s growing interest in creating disruptions within Pakistan, and that’s partly true. But actually predicting the absence of a spring offensive in Afghanistan is a bold and significant statement. I think it reflects Rodriguez’s understanding that the Pakistani army has got a key section of the Taliban bottled up and under assault across the border in Pakistan. But U.S. sources themselves are playing down the significance of this development, so as not to stimulate a backlash among Pakistanis angry at their army’s cooperation with America.

There is at least the prospect of a major shift in the war on terror here. If (and it’s a big if) the Pakistani army can successfully prosecute its campaign against the Taliban and its al-Qaeda allies in South Waziristan, that will give us a huge boost in Afghanistan. But this is only the beginning of a complicated and risky new phase in the war on terror. There are signs that the fighting will spread to North Waziristan. That would mean an ultimate showdown in the Islamists’ last big refuge (and the site of al-Qaeda’s many terror-training camps), and it’s unclear that the Pakistani army will be up to that challenge.

Also, Taliban leader Baitullah Mehsud has promised major attacks on security installations in the capital if the army presses forward with its attack. So we could soon see some serious terrorism in Islamabad and other major Pakistani cities, with the real possibility of destabilization. Much depends on broader public reaction to the assault in Waziristan. But with the press and government playing this down, and with the public distracted by the election campaign, there is at least a decent chance that Pakistan’s army will be able to deal the Taliban and al-Qaeda a major blow in Waziristan, without excessive blowback in Pakistan itself.

For more on the offensive now underway in Waziristan, and how it involves a variation on our "tribal strategy" from Anbar, see "Offensive in Waziristan?" and "Tribal War in Waziristan?"

And here's some interesting stuff from the Gates story linked to above; will our media notice?
...
The U.S. military is also beginning to construct as many as eight coordination centers along the Afghan-Pakistani border that will be staffed by officers from the three countries to more closely share intelligence and conduct combat operations, according to Maj. Gen. David Rodriguez, the top U.S. commander for eastern Afghanistan.

The first border center is being built at Torkham Gate [I've been through it several times, some time ago - MC] in Afghanistan, a key crossing near the Khyber Pass and about 30 miles from the Pakistani city of Peshawar, Rodriguez said...

Rodriguez said Pakistani military leaders are increasingly willing to cooperate in operations on either side of the border. There is "a growing realization amongst all of them, that everybody needs to do more together," he said at a Pentagon briefing this week.

Last year, the U.S. military in Afghanistan established a shared computer link with the Pakistani military's headquarters and set up high-frequency radio communications to coordinate cross-border operations. It also surveyed Pakistani, Afghan and U.S. border positions, and stepped up training of Afghan border police.
And there may have been dissension amongst Taliban ranks in Pakistan. According to this story:
...
Taliban leader Mullah Omar has put his foot down and reset the goals for the Taliban: their primary task is the struggle in Afghanistan, not against the Pakistan state.

Mullah Omar has sacked his own appointed leader of the Pakistani Taliban, Baitullah Mehsud, the main architect of the fight against Pakistani security forces, and urged all Taliban commanders to turn their venom against North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) forces, highly placed contacts in the Taliban told Asia Times Online. Mullah Omar then appointed Moulvi Faqir Mohammed (a commander from Bajaur Agency) but he refused the job. In the past few days, the Pakistani Taliban have held several meetings but have not yet appointed a replacement to Mehsud...
Update: No sale for Mr Gates' troop offer:
Pakistan's Musharraf Says No US Troops

1 Comments:

Blogger Cameron Campbell said...

I'm not at all happy with Pakistan's internal "government", nor some of their activities, but I totally empathize about the rock and the hard place they find themselves between geopolitically...

3:27 p.m., January 25, 2008  

Post a Comment

<< Home