Tuesday, August 28, 2007

CC-177 delivers supplies to Jamaica

Image by Sgt. Kevin MacAulay, CF Combat Camera

Speaking of the right tools for the mission—our brand-new CC-177 Globemaster III flew its first operational mission last week, delivering supplies to Jamaica for the victims of Hurricane Dean:

"By using our new C-17, Canada’s New Government is responding today to the humanitarian emergency in Jamaica with a large shipment of emergency aid supplies," said Minister Oda. "The 32 tons of supplies, such as tarps, jerricans and buckets that we are sending will bring much-needed relief to the victims of Hurricane Dean."

"Today’s shipment of such a large quantity of supplies across this long distance would not have been possible without our new C-17 Canadian Forces aircraft," said Minister MacKay. "I am proud that we now have this capability, and the Canadian Forces can contribute toward this important relief effort and helping to alleviate the human suffering caused by Hurricane Dean."

-- DND/CF, "Canada Sends New C-17 to Jamaica with Supplies for the Victims of Hurricane Dean", August 23rd, 2007.

This is what you can do with the right tools for the job. And there are sound reasons for employing a Globemaster, and not some other type of airlifter. Useful to keep in mind when a skeptic starts spouting nonsense about how the C-17 is an unnecessary purchase, and how these missions can be accomplished by other craft.

For the record, yes, a CC-150 Polaris can accommodate this payload. However, a Polaris (like all commercial aircraft) requires specific cargo loading/unloading equipment known as a K-loader. It's actually pictured above (the thing the camo-clad loaders are standing on), during the upload process at CFB Trenton.

The K-loader has to raise itself up to cargo door height, take on a couple pallets or containers, lower itself to ground level, and then something else (like a 10,000lb forklift) has to come grab the pallets and shuffle them off to a cargo receiving area. Then the K-loader raises itself again and grabs the next few pallets. Rinse and repeat until the payload is offloaded. If it sounds slow and boring, that's because it is.

Palletised payloads, however, can be directly downloaded from the C-17's rear ramp by a 10,0o0lb forklift without any K-loader involvement. The C-17 could actually carry its own forklift from the airfield of origin to the destination, and offload that first via the rear ramp. So even if your destination has no cargo-handling capability whatsoever, you can still bring your own. There's many sound reasons for using the Globemaster rather than the Polaris.

The CC-130H Hercules would also be an unsuitable choice for this mission. Moving thirteen 463L pallets (32 tons in total) from from CFB Trenton to Kingston, Jamaica, requires three aircraft—H-mod Hercs can only carry six pallets at a time—or one aircraft making three return trips. The CC-130 also has a rear ramp however, so it too can be offloaded by a forklift.

Each Herc carries a crew of five—2 pilots, 1 navigator, 1 flight engineer, and 1 loadmaster. That's fifteen people to move these pallets, or a week of duty days for a single aircrew. The Herc would make each 1,568nm trip in 6 hours—that's 12 hours including the return trip. So for a single CC-130H aircraft to move these 13 pallets, it would require three 12-hour trips, or three aircraft making a single 12-hour return flight. Not including ground handling, offload and refueling times.

In contrast, a single CC-177 can fly all 13 pallets to Jamaica in 3 hours, 49 minutes, using a single aircrew of three (2 pilots, 1 loadmaster). And it can carry sufficient fuel for the entire journey. Tack on the return trip and you have the entire mission completed in just under 8 hours, not including ground handling and offload times.

Remind me why the CC-177 isn't the best choice in this scenario?

18 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

those are powered rollers on the GM3 . . so a crew of three can unload on-site, without assistance if needed. Try that in a Polaris or Herc

Faster, cheaper, easier . . .

1:13 p.m., August 28, 2007  
Blogger Gilles said...

"Remind me why the CC-177 isn't the best choice in this scenario?"

Because a CC-150 could have taken 19 pallets (16 upstairs, 3 in the forward lower, plus 6 LD-3 containers in the lower rear) in les time (its faster than a CC-177, with les crew (it only as a pilot and first-officer) and and without haveing to spend 3.4 billion dollars that could have been spent and better things, even within the CF. The down side, is, yes, it needs a K-Loader to be unloaded, which in the case of Jamaica, is a machine that exists in large numbers. In the few cases where we had to send something to a place K-Loaders were not available, we could a) rent an IL-76 for 13,000$ an hour b) send a K-Loader inside a CC-130.
That was a waste of money. There are some many better and more urgent things the CF could have purchased with that money.....

3:17 p.m., August 28, 2007  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

"There are some many better and more urgent things the CF could have purchased with that money....."

pls start your list so we can consider it . . .

3:43 p.m., August 28, 2007  
Blogger Gilles said...

You could read the previous post on this Blog for starters......

4:09 p.m., August 28, 2007  
Blogger Chris Taylor said...

If 19 pallets were required, then I'm sure the ALCC would have allocated different assets. As it is, the CC-177 had room for five more 463Ls, but they weren't carried.

There's only two Polaris birds in a semi-available state, and they are almost always scheduled for runs to Afstan. That will change as more CC-177s come online, but I can't see the ALCC disrupting the current CC-150 strat-lift schedule until there are enough CC-177s and aircrews available to supplant it entirely.

And as for speed, the Polaris would get there 23 minutes ahead of a CC-177. It's an improvement, all right, but not a giant leap forward. You're going to lose those 23 minutes (and then some) during download with the K-loader.

4:39 p.m., August 28, 2007  
Blogger WE Speak said...

Canada has 5 CC-150's, two of which are now being converted to strategic air to air refueling tankers, expanding our capabilities. They also serve as passenger, medical and VIP aircraft.

The CC-177 now gives Canada dedicated heavy lift capability.

7:43 p.m., August 28, 2007  
Blogger WE Speak said...

This comment has been removed by the author.

7:47 p.m., August 28, 2007  
Blogger WE Speak said...

BBS said...

"rent an IL-76 for 13,000$"

During emergency situations, it is extremely difficult to rent IL-76's, as there is a long line, along with increased costs. CC-177's can now deliver our DART onsite almost anywhere in the world, same day. As well, they are now taking a huge load off of our overused and aging Herc fleet.

7:49 p.m., August 28, 2007  
Blogger Chris Taylor said...

Canada has 5 CC-150's, two of which are now being converted to strategic air to air refueling tankers, expanding our capabilities. They also serve as passenger, medical and VIP aircraft.

Apologies if I was not overly clear. I didn't mean we had only two, total. I meant only two of the five are available for strat-lift work now. One's in a VIP state fairly regularly, two are in for MRTT work right now, leaving two for strat-lift work--which they are fulfilling for Afstan.

11:22 p.m., August 28, 2007  
Blogger WE Speak said...

I should have been clearer Chris, I was replying to a taxpayer.

With the CC-150's available as tankers, the CC-177 for heavy lift and any combination of Herc and CC-150 for delivering the troops, the capabilities of the Air Force have dramatically increased. Hell, we could probably provide our own fighter cover for the whole shooting match.

6:37 a.m., August 29, 2007  
Blogger Cameron Campbell said...

When, oh when, will they stop calling themselves Canada's New Government? It's childish, it's further politicization of the communications function and it's fucking annoying.

10:14 a.m., August 29, 2007  
Blogger Mark Dowling said...

Well, in fairness an A310 shouldn't really have much trouble unloading in Jamaica given the volume of civil traffic it sees? However, as a training exercise for a more rough and ready operation, for instance if it had been East Timor or some other less developed destination it was probably worth doing, not to mention giving some more familiarisation with the systems prior to heading into potentially hostile fire, tactical approaches etc.

When is the MRTT work going to finish? Haven't we had them a long time now for the tanker work to be done? It'll be time to retire them and get A330Ks at this rate :)

A taxpayer, it's really sad that you're still banging at the Antonov/Ilyushin drum. Have you missed the fact that the Alaskan and northern UK QRA flights are back in business with Russian customers?

2:21 p.m., August 31, 2007  
Blogger Gary Drummond said...

This story received virtually no attention in our leftist MSM.

The liberals continue to condemn the purchase of this aircraft. They would rather we rent Anatonovs and repeat the embarrassment of Sri Lanka.

Heaven forbid a humanitarian story that justifies the overdue acquisition of this strategic transport.

10:54 a.m., September 03, 2007  
Blogger Gilles said...

The funny thing in this picture is that both a forklift and a K-Loader are being used together to load this C-17. The forklift can be seen putting a pallet on a K-Loader, which is then going to slide the pallet inside the C-17. I thought the K-Loader was not needed? Military efficiency? I

10:56 a.m., September 03, 2007  
Blogger Gilles said...

To Gary Drummond: there was no embarrassment in the Sri Lanka DART deployment, at least not where it relates to leasing aircraft anyway. Please please read : An Urban Legend

11:05 a.m., September 03, 2007  
Blogger Unknown said...

Just a FYI, lots of broken links here.

11:33 p.m., January 20, 2010  
Blogger Babbling Brooks said...

Tom, that's because the post is two and a half years old. News links tend to go stale quite quickly.

9:10 a.m., January 21, 2010  
Blogger Mark, Ottawa said...

Actually it's the CF links that are most often gone since the government changed all the old ones when its "common look and feel" policy for websites was put into effect last year. Blast them.

Mark
Ottawa

9:48 a.m., January 21, 2010  

Post a Comment

<< Home