More problems for Cormorants
posted by Mark, Ottawa at 3:28 p.m.
Wednesday, February 14, 2007
The Torch is a group weblog focusing on the Canadian military.
Contributors:
- Damian - Babbling Brooks
- Mark from Ottawa
- Paul Synnott - BBS
- The Monarchist
- The Phantom Observer
- Tony - Milnews.ca
Damian's Afghanistan Posts
- Welcome to the two-way range
- The winning percentage
- Tac Hel
- Compatriots
- On the boardwalk
- Patrol, pt.1 - headed to Double K
- Patrol, pt.2 - Dand District Centre
- Corrections: thankless and rewarding
- Canada/Afghanistan (and me)
- A little goes a long way
- Photo Album
The opinions expressed in each blog post at The Torch are those of the specific post's contributor, and should not be attributed to any other group, organization or individual with which any of the contributors is affiliated, including each other. Neither do others' comments to these posts represent the contributors' opinions. Furthermore, any links provided to other websites are for information purposes only, and don't imply any endorsement on the part of the contributors.
This website is not endorsed by the Department of National Defence, the Government of Canada, or any other group or organization.
LCol John McCrae
Maps
Afghanistan pol/topo
Afghanistan ethnolinguistic
SW Asia ethnolinguistic
Afghanistan ISAF RC & PRT
Kandahar districts
Previous Posts
- Senlis Council slams ISAF
- "...you preening jackass"
- Ouch
- Afstan: What should Canada do?
- Insurance band-aids
- Afstan: More Norwegian troops
- Afstan: Senate Committee fingers NATO allies/Sugge...
- Conference of Defence Associations Institute Annua...
- Afghan government feuding with Brits
- Canada to get Leopard 2s?
2 Comments:
So you're saying you have no idea what is going on but everyone else is wrong?
Now you've said something. Before. Not so very much.
Oh, and "But officials with the union representing Cormorant maintenance workers, employed by private industry, say the problems are greater than the government is acknowledging." I'd emphasize something to make it clearer for you, but then I'd have to put the whole quote in bold. And that is rude.
Post a Comment
<< Home