Thursday, June 11, 2009

Afghan infowar: US fights back/YouTube and video

Seems as if some real progress is being made; US military are heavily into new media:
...
With unusual speed, officials release a video of a grenade attack to counter accusations against U.S. soldiers.


Reporting from Bagram Air Base, Afghanistan -- The accusation was damning: U.S. soldiers were said to have tossed a grenade into a crowd of Afghans in the eastern province of Kunar on Tuesday, killing two civilians and wounding five to 50 others.

American public affairs officers previously have been slow in responding. U.S. military officials here complain that Taliban leaders are often better and faster at spreading their versions of deadly events.

This time, however, public affairs officers mounted a swift and detailed information operation. Within 24 hours, a public affairs team at Bagram air base released a video showing an explosion as U.S. soldiers worked to free an American military vehicle stuck on a median in the town of Asadabad. It also provided technical details it said proved the grenade was a Russian-made version commonly used by insurgents.

It is not clear from the murky video, taken at a distance, who threw the grenade. But no American soldier is seen throwing anything.

The unusually rapid release of the video was clearly intended to show that American soldiers working on a marooned vehicle were hardly likely to detonate a grenade next to their own vehicles and comrades, three of whom were slightly wounded.

The video was posted on Facebook and YouTube, part of a burgeoning U.S. effort to use social networking sites to build support for coalition forces locked in a struggle to win over the Afghan population in the face of an entrenched Islamic insurgency. The U.S. military regularly issues statements denying accusations of misconduct, but release of combat videos has been rare.

The overnight posting of the video underscores the long-held belief within the U.S. military that it needs to be faster and more sophisticated in responding to false allegations.

Army Lt. Col. Clarence Counts, a public affairs officer at Bagram, said officials sped up the normally cumbersome release process for sensitive video feeds to quickly knock down the grenade accusations. Counts said he could not recall a similar instance in recent months.

Counts, who was involved in the information effort over the grenade accusations, said officers decided "to be a little quicker off our feet" once they realized the video was available.

"We'd love to be able to do this every time," he said. "That's our goal."

Counts said U.S. officials understood that they needed to improve their information efforts, but often were constrained by security regulations that keep sensitive information under wraps. Taliban militants release detailed statements almost instantly because they often make up the information, Counts said.

An improved flow of information is seen as a crucial priority for Army Gen. Stanley McChrystal, the incoming commander of U.S. and allied forces in Afghanistan, as he overhauls the Afghan war strategy.

Further underscoring the importance, the military has appointed a Navy rear admiral, Greg Smith, to oversee public affairs operations in Afghanistan. McChrystal is said to want more rapid public disclosure of information...
Here's video from US Forces - Afghanistan (here's USFOR-A's YouTube channel.:

Similar video, with voiceover, from DoD''s YouTube channel (there's a separate, official, Pentagon Channel).

Plus a Reuters video that features "NATO's Brigadier-General Richard Blanchette [a Canadian] in Kabul...made available to Reuters by the Pentagon." Odd that, an ISAF officer being "made available" by the Pentagon. That confusing command structure...

It remains to be seen now effective with Afghans the new approach will be. Meanwhile, at this point there's nothing about the grenade attack on natochannel.tv (see "NATO in Afghanistan"); maybe the NATO approval process is still too slow for the sort of response the Americans made.

More on the public communications battle:
Infowar: Pentagon new media outreach for Afstan

Improving ISAF's infowar

2 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Well its about time . . . . kudos to the Americans for realizing military actions are just politics by other means.

Now if we could just get this message through to the tall foreheads at le Brick Brain sur Rideau that this is a very real part of counter insurgency operations . . . .

7:22 p.m., June 11, 2009  
Blogger David M said...

The Thunder Run has linked to this post in the blog post From the Front: 06/12/2009 News and Personal dispatches from the front and the home front.

9:47 a.m., June 12, 2009  

Post a Comment

<< Home