Know thine enemy
Further to this post, it's clear Terry Glavin knows his (links in original):
...You'd think that it would fairly evident by now that there are some kinds of enemies who will want to kill you no matter whether you're wearing a blue helmet or a brown one, or whether you're just a brave, unarmed woman, trying to help disabled children get an education.Do read the whole post. Then there's this:
You'd think it would be clear by now that enemies of this kind will want to kill you whether you are an infidel or not, and whether you are a foreigner or not: Case, Kirk, Dial and Aimal were working for the International Rescue Committee in Afghanistan, where all but 10 of the IRC's 600 workers are Afghans, and Muslims.
But the delusion persists, as is most vividly demonstrated by the likes of NDP rising star Michael NDP rising star Michael Byers: "In Afghanistan, it's time to move from a combat-oriented approach to one that focuses on negotiation, peacemaking and nation-building. . . It's time to move NATO troops out, and UN peacekeepers in." And this: "NATO troops should be replaced with UN peacekeepers."..
You need soldiers...Even if the NDP is sincerely and honestly ignorant of that fact and of so many other plain facts of recent history, the vast majority of the Afghan people are not, as the journalist-humanitarian Sarah Chayes, writing from Kandahar, patiently explains to readers of the Globe and Mail last week. The enemy we're up against will hang a 16-year old boy for the crime of working as an apprentice to a driver of a truck that carries humanitarian wheat to Kandahar, for starters. "The Afghans do not support this so-called insurgency. They are its primary targets, Chayes writes...
A Special Kind of Pathology
1 Comments:
"A Special Kind of Pathology" is an apt name for these folks on the extreme left Mr. Glavin describes. I've tried discoursing with a number of the people of the type he describes and it's been impossible. I've despaired of ever having a civil, open-minded exchange of views. They've acquired a set of unshakable interlocking biases that constitute their world-view and philosophy. If we pull out combat troops and send in Peacekeepers...If we bury our heads and go into denial of the necessity of our combating evil in Af-stan...
The matters at stake, combating trans-national Islamofascism, specifically herein the campaign to liberate and secure freedom in Afghanistan, are too momentous to not have public support in the NATO nations who have sent troops into battle there. How can we (on either side of the border) have a functioning, healthy democracy when one side makes civil discourse on these grave issues impossible?
Post a Comment
<< Home