Thursday, March 20, 2008

What an amazing coincidence!

Apart from the seriousness of the security breach - that din reminiscent of a bowling alley you've been hearing all morning is the sound of heads rolling in the hallways of CANSOFCOM, or it should be - a couple of points strike me as odd from this story.

First, a cynical old hand like Pugliese must have been forcing his fingers to move over the keys as he typed this mind-boggling account of how the documents were found:

The blueprints were found March 13 by the spouse of Anthony Salloum, an analyst with the Rideau Institute, the left-leaning Ottawa think-tank. As the couple were on their way to dinner, Mr. Salloum's spouse noticed a large pile of garbage bags on the sidewalk, on top of which sat seven large rolled tubes of paper stamped with Defence Department markings.

"I thought they looked interesting, but we were headed to dinner, so I figured I'd pick one up on the way back if they were still there," said Mr. Salloum.

The blueprints were still sitting in the garbage an hour or so later, so Mr. Salloum took one of the rolls. He doesn't know what happened to the rest of the rolls.


Mr. Salloum should purchase a lottery ticket. C'mon, there's what - a million people in the metro Ottawa area - and an analyst for one of DND's fiercest critics is the one who stumbles across these papers? If that's true, then perhaps I should also rethink my earlier dismissal of the Tooth Fairy. Truth may be stranger than fiction in some cases, but this smells far more like the latter than the former to me.

Second, if you were the one, gentle reader, who happened across what were obviously sensitive documents in a pile of garbage in the street, would your first call be to a reporter for the local newspaper? Mine would be to the police. And, since I know a few people in uniform, to NDHQ. The fact that DND learned of this indiscretion from The Ottawa Citizen speaks volumes to me about the character of the Rideau Institute and its employees.

This is one hell of a security SNAFU, and now that it has happened and we can't un-ring the bell, I'm glad it has come to public light: the necessary procedural changes will be made, and the necessary asses will be chewed. But what a sorry spectacle to get there.

Reminds me of another incident where the prime focus was to embarrass the government rather than do what was in the best interests of the nation. Hmm. That must be coincidence too.

Update: From the comments:

Heads at CANSOFCOM shouldn't have to roll. They aren't responsible for document control of blueprints, spec's etc. for Base Construction projects. Want to lay blame within DND, look at Base Construction or Defense Construction Canada. In reality, the responsibility lies with Public Works, not DND...


My bad. Apologies to those unfairly called out. Of course, that just means different heads should roll.

6 Comments:

Blogger WE Speak said...

Glad to see I'm not the only one who thought the discovery by an employee of the Rideau institute had a certain odour to it.

6:36 p.m., March 20, 2008  
Blogger Chris & Sarah said...

Couple of points to note:

1. Heads at CANSOFCOM shouldn't have to roll. They aren't responsible for document control of blueprints, spec's etc. for Base Construction projects. Want to lay blame withyin DND, look at Base Construction or Defense Construction Canada. In reality, the responsibility lies with Public Works, not DND.

2. I agree this has a rather malodourous tinge to it. Just what are the odds.

3. With the huge number of non-military players involved in any base construction project, do you really think that the docs were originally secure to start with.

Let's keep some perspective on the reality of the situation, and not look for heads to roll where they shouldn't. This will become a mere tempest in a teapot, with the media and political agendists ensuring that it does not die the quick death it deserves.

7:34 p.m., March 20, 2008  
Blogger Mark, Ottawa said...

Mr Pugliese reveals his attitude:

"Then I had a another thought (my cynical side working overtime). This seemed too bizarre to be a coincidence- especially since it involved Mr. Staples and Mr. Salloum. Maybe someone was setting these two guys up for a fall. Certainly, catching DND’s critics with sensitive records might be a good way of discrediting both Mr. Staples and Mr. Salloum, since after all they had become royal pains in the ass for DND.

Had someone placed the rolled blueprints on Bank Street just so Mr. Salloum’s spouse would see them? The documents were so big….at least a metre in length, they would be impossible for someone to miss."

Boy, might the CF make foreign intelligence agencies look like amateurs, at least to a fevered brain. Maybe George Bush did it.

Mark
Ottawa

7:43 p.m., March 20, 2008  
Blogger WE Speak said...

Mr Pugliese fails to consider the reverse, that these documents were actually leaked to the Rideau and garbage find was designed to conceal the leak. Cuts both ways.

8:29 p.m., March 20, 2008  
Blogger Babbling Brooks said...

Exactly what I was thinking, BBS.

9:49 p.m., March 20, 2008  
Blogger Dave in Pa. said...

"...a third rate burglary", as the White House initially described the Watergate break-in.

Actually, bbs' theory makes sense. It's done in a way that fingers can't be pointed at anyone or any organization or office. Plus, Salloum gets to look almost like some sort of hero. Plausible deniability all around, with the DND, and by connection, the Cons. Govt. is made to look foolish and slack on security. Somebody's mission accomplished.

I wonder if there's any technical way to determine specifically which computer and/or printer produced these documents? (As in the Rathergate Faux Docs fraud) It's not like these are 8X11 inkjet docs. I'm guessing that these type and size tech docs would require an expensive specialized printer, not an everyday inkjet or laser, which would narrow down the possible source machines considerably.

Any technical experts out there have an opinion on this possibility?

10:05 p.m., March 24, 2008  

Post a Comment

<< Home