Saturday, March 01, 2008

Afstan: Different ways of viewing the glass

1) Canwest News Service: Taliban invisible but for bombs: No Combat
KANDAHAR AIRFIELD, AFGHANISTAN - Fighting has dropped off to zero in the province of Kandahar this year, according to the outgoing commander of the Canadian battle group here.

"In the past two months, the enemy has not had any direct contact with the coalition and I have no trouble with that," Lieutenant Colonel Alain Gauthier said yesterday while discussing what he described as an improved security situation in Panjwaii and Zahri districts, where most of the fighting with the Taliban has been concentrated since Canadian forces returned to a combat role in Kandahar two years ago.

However, there continues to be a high number of casualties caused by improvised explosive devices (IEDs) and suicide attacks. Asked about this, Lt.-Col. Gauthier said: "That announces the end of the reign of the Taliban."

The colonel commanded a battle group that had been built around the 3rd battalion, the Royal 22nd Regiment, popularly known as the Van Doos. A large number of the battle group boarded aircraft for Quebec late yesterday after handing over responsibility for defending Kandahar to a Manitoba-based battle group.

"We maintained the initiative," Lt.-Col. Gauthier, who also served with the Van Doos in Timor, said in explaining his unit's strategy. "We didn't allow the repositioning of the supplies and weapons of enemy combatants."..
2) Globe and Mail: AFGHANISTAN: FACING THE UGLY TRUTH
Dramatic increases in bloodshed, a growing insurgency fuelled by local grievances, serious shortfalls in troops and equipment. The situation is bleak. Still many seem to agree: The worst is yet to come...
In fact not much new in the article (which has a whole mass of graphics and charts in the print version that are very hard to grok--they're almost easier to fathom at p. 5 of the online version); see this post from a month ago:
Critically reviewing Afstan

5 Comments:

Blogger Dave in Pa. said...

Amazing how the political bias and agenda of the Globe & Mail affects their interpretation of the same set of facts about Af-stan from which others draw very different conclusions!

Shall we call the Globe & Mail the NY Times of Canada or shall we call the NY Times the Globe & Mail of America? :-)

4:51 p.m., March 01, 2008  
Blogger Mark, Ottawa said...

At least those papers are not yet The Guardian:

"Afghanistan mission close to failing - US
...
A big injection of foreign troops has failed to bring stability. The US has almost 50,000 soldiers in Afghanistan..."

The facts:

"More troops for Iraq and Afghanistan, Defense Department says
...
[Lt. Gen. Carter] Ham also announced that the Pentagon believes U.S. force levels in Afghanistan will stand at 32,000 in late summer, up from about 28,000 currently. The current total is the highest since the war began in October 2001, and another 3,200 Marines are scheduled to deploy to Afghanistan this spring..."

Mark
Ottawa

5:05 p.m., March 01, 2008  
Blogger Dave in Pa. said...

Mark,

I find our "allies" the French particularly irksome. As I see it, there's no MILITARY reason why France couldn't permanently maintain an even bigger combat force in the combat provinces than does Britain, with around 7,200 troops there.

While we all enjoy a joke from time to time about French military prowess, the fact is the French have a high quality standing military. If memory serves, their regular Army has 5 divisions and the Foreign Legion, while much smaller than in colonial days, has 3 regiments. From what I've recently seen on the Military Channel and the History Channel, today's Foreign Legion are some extremely capable infantry warriors.

(In alphabetical order) There's a lot of American, British, Canadian troops buried in France. IMO, France's niggardly, mean-spirited lack of burden-sharing with their Allies in this Global War on Terror reflects shamefully on the honor of the French nation.

5:52 p.m., March 01, 2008  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Over time, I have come to the opinion that the next time the Germans decide to kick the crap out of France, we should just let them and makes sure to tell the Germans they can keep it.

7:28 p.m., March 01, 2008  
Blogger Babbling Brooks said...

Careful badmouthing the French too badly, gents. You may well be forced to eat those words shortly. 'Nuff said.

9:37 p.m., March 01, 2008  

Post a Comment

<< Home