Wednesday, January 16, 2008

The spat over the CF's SAT (Strategic Advisory Team) in Kabul

Foreign Affairs, and the Globe and Mail, really seem to have it in for the SAT. This online piece in the paper sums it up nicely:
In Afghanistan, our rivalries conspire to make a great nation small

On Monday, the Globe and Mail broke the story of interdepartmental conflict threatening Canada's Strategic Advisory Team (SAT) in Kabul, arguably the most influential contribution that Canada has made to Afghanistan. What a shame that limited vision and bureaucratic pettiness have apparently conspired to jeopardize this contribution...
While two letters today, under the title Bringing home the SAT, respond to this Globe editorial:

1) By MIKE CAPSTICK, Colonel (ret'd)
Calgary -- Your editorial on the employment of Canadian military personnel to assist the Afghan government (Put Real Civilians In These Positions - Jan. 15) demonstrates a complete misunderstanding of the Strategic Advisory Team's role. As the SAT's first commander, I can assure you it does not pretend to provide expert advice on governance. Instead, it provides Afghan ministers with crucial strategic planning skills and helps Afghan civil servants develop those skills, a task that military professionals are expert at.

In an ideal world, civilians should be included on the team (and there are always one or two). But the reality is that both the Department of Foreign Affairs and the Canadian International Development Agency have to scramble to fill their essential posts in Afghanistan. In short, the Canadian Forces is the only government agency that can generate and sustain the requisite number of people willing to deploy to a dangerous environment for a year.
2) By ROGER LUCY:
Ottawa -- While, in an ideal world, SAT members should come from the public service rather than the military, it's doubtful if any civilian arm of government could draw on such a large pool of talented personnel, able to be deployed at short notice to dangerous places. But I can't fault your bottom line: By all means, bring the SAT home. But set it up in a discreet cell in the Privy Council Office. Perhaps it can work the same magic in Ottawa rebuilding civic institutions that it has in Kabul.
Here's the latest Globe story:
A team of Canadian military advisers in Kabul will be a victim of their success if they are disbanded, senior Canadian officials said yesterday as they refused to guarantee the survival of the lauded Strategic Advisory Team.

Sources have said that SAT, a group of about 20 high-level military planners embedded in the capital with Afghanistan's fledgling government, is facing the axe.

At a briefing yesterday, senior officials insisted that no decision has been made regarding the future of SAT, adding that its existence is being reviewed.

A senior government official, who has seen SAT in action in recent days, said the team works effectively and in a collegial manner alongside Afghan officials. However, the official said, it's time to take a deep look at the structure of the three-year-old group of military officials.

The senior official said that DND, the RCMP, Foreign Affairs and Correctional Service Canada are trying to find "the best formula to be able to continue having the impact that we have.

"For the Afghan government, a major problem is the human capacity to co-ordinate its activities and its progress. That team helps them, and now we have to find the formula to continue, either through a team or through another means."

Another official insisted that SAT will survive - for now."At this time, there has been no decision, either by Foreign Affairs or anyone else, to put an end to the activities of the SAT," the official said.

Chief of the Defence Staff General Rick Hillier put the team in place in 2005 after Afghan President Hamid Karzai mentioned he had appreciated the work of a small group of senior Canadian military officers who performed similar tasks. The Afghan ambassador to Canada said this week that SAT will be missed if the team is disbanded.

But Paul Heinbecker, a former Canadian ambassador to the United Nations, said that SAT produces a confusing power structure in Afghanistan.

He added it's time to bring the advisory role back under the authority of Canada's diplomats.

"The problem I have is with making it permanent. It leads to confusion, and sooner or later, it becomes a problem about who is speaking for Canada," Mr. Heinbecker said.
Update: An article on the SAT by Col. Capstick (via Spotlight on Military News and International) Affairs

1 Comments:

Blogger brenda said...

This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.

6:25 p.m., February 12, 2008  

Post a Comment

<< Home