Wednesday, November 14, 2007

Soldiers. With pamphlets. Recruiting. In our schools.

Save us, Maude Barlow!

Earlier this month, the Council of Canadians got their collective knickers in a twist over the prospect of the Canadian Forces recruiting at high schools, colleges and universities.

In fact, they have even conducted "outreach" at elementary schools. As reported by CBC.ca on June 15, 2007, "The Canadian Forces have been touring schools in the St. John's area this week, as part of an outreach program." The story reports that a Grade 3 "class at Holy Cross Elementary school (in Holyrood, Newfoundland) were given a first-hand show-and-tell session with a tank and related gear."

-- Brent Patterson, "ACTION ALERT: Stop military recruiting in our schools". Council of Canadians website, November 2nd, 2007.

I think this is the CBC story they were referring to, but could not be bothered to link. The military life is not everyone's cup of tea, I admit, but the father is clearly out of his depth when he characterises the visit as recruitment. Especially when one considers that kids in Grades 4, 5 and 6 will not be eligible to enlist for another 5-7 years, minimum. When I was in elementary school we got visits from TTC buses, fire trucks, police cars and a McDonald's coach bus. I'm not sure any of us came away from these visits with the burning need to pursue any of the careers on display. Though I did (and still do) have a burning need to get one of those free cardboard models of a TTC bus or streetcar; the one I received in Grade Four got crushed on the walk home.

But wait, it gets even better.

Andrew Cash wrote in the May 25, 2006 issue of Toronto's NOW magazine, "In both Toronto's public and Catholic boards, the (military co-op program) pays kids to join the Reserves, gives them four high school credits and trains them in, among other soldiering arts, machine gun shooting and grenade throwing...The crisp military brochures most guidance offices make available to students talk up the career aspects of the military while conveniently ignoring the elephant in the room: the fact that a soldier is trained to kill and die on command. Do we really want a merging of public education and military objectives when it appears we have no national consensus on our new U.S.-inspired war aims."

This might be news to Mr. Cash, but enrolment in the military's high school co-op program is very much predicated on 1) good grades and 2) parental consent, since minors cannot sign away their lives on their own authority. Soldiering is paid work, funnily enough, so yes, the students draw a cheque for their efforts.

Further, the soldiering arts of shooting accuracy and grenade drill are an inseparable part of basic training known as BMQ/SQ (Basic Military Qualification/Soldier Qualification). These courses are mandatory for anyone in a Land trade. Mechanics, engineers, drivers, you name it. Before you get anywhere near your specialised trade, every CF enlistee or officer completes BMQ. Land trades then complete the SQ course before moving on to their specialist school.

In other words, the high school military co-op course gets the student through the basic training required of all CF enlistees. Oh, the humanity. Who will stop the onslaught of co-op trained adolescent killbots? Maude, pass the smelling salts.

My favourite part of this action alert are the cautiounary examples culled from various print media:

* The London Free Press reported on October 19, 2007, "One Grade 12 student irked by (a) military event at South secondary school has received permission from administrators to hold a simultaneous anti-war event in another part of the school...He said that earlier this week it looked as if his counter-recruitment event -- he asked the school for permission last week -- wouldn't be allowed..."

Look how the BushHarperCo war machine is stifling dissent amongst our young people. Rise, young men and women and sing the music of a people that will not be slaves again.

Of course, the Council of Canadians declines to mention that the objecting student got to hold his counter-recruitment event after all. That would spoil the narrative.

* As reported by London Indymedia on February 24, 2007, "the Canadian military has been drastically increasing their presence at Fanshawe (College in London, Ontario)...All year, recruiters have been setting up booths and tables inside our college, convincing us to join the military instead of pursuing our own dreams for which we are in college in the first place." ...

If a recruiter manages to dissuade you from pursuing your life-long dream career, then I submit that one's reservoirs of dedication and perseverence were never particularly deep.

Heaven forbid that one's lifelong dream is to actually join the military. I knew from Grade Six onward that it was my preferred career—this despite an entire lack of at-school military recruiting. And mother's prohibition against anything resembling a toy gun—including Star Wars blasters and the like.

* And as reported by the student newspaper The Manitoban Online in 2006, "While some Canadian universities remain unconcerned about the militarization of student space, others are more critical. Students at UBC are currently organizing to resist the presence of recruiters. Concordia University in Montreal has a policy banning military recruitment on campus entirely, and the Link, Concordia’s independent student newspaper, includes the Canadian Forces on its advertising boycott list."

The militarization of student space? Students are compelled to obey military discipline, to learn warrior arts, and to serve their country against their own will?

No, I think not.

These students are asked to endure the temporary presence of up to six recruiting staff—on a campus built to accommodate thousands. No one is being compelled into warfighting, any more than a half-dozen homeless people at King and Bay compel the descent of the tower-dwellers above into base vagrancy.

It is a safe bet that less than 1% of the student body at any given civilian university can tell you what the Queen's Regulations and Orders are, and whether or not civilians are bound by them. When I see students being arraigned and charged with striking a superior, desertion, disgraceful conduct or drunkenness, then I will believe that militarization of the academy is at hand.

Until then, simmer down Council of Fussbudgets. The terrifying Thousand-Year Rural Reich has not engulfed us just yet.

7 Comments:

Blogger Unknown said...

WHAT? That's not fair! They never brought a Tank to my school when I was a kid.

I'm writing a letter. Maybe they'll swing by my office for a show and tell. That would be cool!

11:20 a.m., November 15, 2007  
Blogger Chris Taylor said...

It's really a Coyote armored reconnaissance vehicle, not a tank. =)

Small distinction, but one I would expect the media (esp. CBC) to at least try to get right in their reporting. Most of the tanks live in Alberta, so only Albertan kids have a snowball's chance in hell at seeing a actual, honest-to-God MBT anywhere near school.

A Grizzly or Cougar AVGP visited my high school in my second-last year, (in association with the kick-off of our Militia co-op course). From what I recall that visit resulted in two students (of a population of 2500-3000) joining said course.

Not exactly duping the masses into joining the ConservaRethuglican war machine.

12:23 p.m., November 15, 2007  
Blogger John of Argghhh! said...

And we are not either trained to die on command. Kill maybe, but *die* on command (or by remote command, in case your nerve fails) is pretty much a characteristic of the now-defunct Imperial Japanese Military and certain Islamo-fascist targets, er, paramilitary groups...

Just sayin'. I never told anyone to die, and was perfectly willing to accept any offered surrenders.

And not just from the girls of Castle Anthrax (just down the road from Castle Argghhh!). Their Grail Beacon is a bit annoying on moonless nights, I admit.

John of Argghhh!

*Hey! Lemme use the strikethrough tag! Pleeeeease?

4:20 p.m., November 15, 2007  
Blogger Mark, Ottawa said...

One member of the NDP with sense (h/t to Damian Penny):

'"What nonsense," Peter Stoffer, the New Democrat MP from Sackville-Eastern Shore, exclaimed yesterday. "I know probably what their sentiment is: it's peace at all costs, and let's have a Kumbaya here.

'Very good career'

"But the reality is, I don't find anything wrong at all with military personnel going into schools and letting them know what they do for a living ... The military can be a very, very good career for young men and women"...

The Council of Canadians' other grievance is that Canada has abandoned its "traditional peacekeeping role." This tradition is a myth. While peacekeeping missions have been in Canada's recent history, our military tradition is one of fighting and winning wars.

Stoffer knows this personally, having been born in Holland, which Canadian soldiers freed from the Nazis in the Second World War.

"My parents were liberated by those brave young kids who left the schools," he said.

The only difference between Stoffer's parents and Afghanis who suffered under the Taliban is that his parents were ruled by tyrants for a shorter period of time before the just nations of the world came to their rescue.'

Good on Mr Stoffer.

Mark
Ottawa

4:54 p.m., November 15, 2007  
Blogger Chris Taylor said...

I saw that at Damian's place too, Mark. Pretty awesome words from the left side of the spectrum. It *is* possible to have perspective on these things... That said, though, I'd wager a fair amount against smilin' Jack sharing Stoffer's point of view.

5:03 p.m., November 15, 2007  
Blogger Unknown said...

The boys from PPCLI drove a light armoured vehicle down 17th Ave during lunch last year just before Stampede. They got a huge roar from the Ship and Anchor patio patrons when the gunner rotated and tipped his barrels.
We got to see a great Armed Forces display outside the SaddleDome, Leopard tank, helicopter, CF-18, personnel carriers.
Canadians need to see this stuff!

11:52 a.m., November 16, 2007  
Blogger Dave in Pa. said...

Mark, the difference is, as you noted, that Mr. Stoffer and his parents have actually lived under tyranny, the Nazi occupation. They know tyranny when they see it.

Jack Layton and others on the delusional hard left no doubt think that Harper and Bush are the real tyrants.

3:39 p.m., November 17, 2007  

Post a Comment

<< Home