Saturday, December 16, 2006

CF-18 replacement possibilities

Not just the F-35 Joint Strike Fighter:
Even though Pentagon officials this week inked agreements with three of the eight Joint Strike Fighter partner nations, two of those countries will continue to examine secondary options to the F-35 [first flight photos at link] in the coming months, international defense officials tell Inside the Air Force...

U.S. and Canadian defense officials finalized terms of the MOU during a Dec. 11 signing ceremony at the Pentagon. Representatives from the U.K. and Australian defense ministries followed suit a day later, ratifying the terms of the MOU during separate ceremonies at the Pentagon and the State Department, respectively.

Noting the effort “has proved to us to be an excellent program [and] an excellent example of international cooperation and collaboration,” Canada’s Joint Strike Fighter program manager, Michael Slack, said his nation is pleased with the final version of the agreement.

“At the end of the day, we reached a consensus on what was going to be required by Canada to operate and sustain these airplanes well into the future,” he said during a Dec. 11 interview...

While echoing the sentiment that preliminary evaluations of the F-35 have shown the aircraft to be the answer to its fighter requirements, Canadian defense officials are also looking at potential alternatives to the fifth-generation aircraft.

“I think that we are going to look at the full spectrum of capabilities to meet future operational requirements,” Slack said in the interview. “If something emerges that turns out to be extremely capable, who knows? I do not have a crystal ball anymore than you do.”

Canadian defense officials are eying the 2012 time frame for a final decision on what platform, or mix of platforms, will replace the F/A -18E/F Super Hornets [well no, they're just Hornets, not "Super" (warning: Boeing site)] that make up the majority [all] of Canada’s fighter fleet.

Production aircraft seen as possible alternatives to the JSF include the JAS 39 Gripen and the Eurofighter Typhoon, along with upgraded versions of the Super Hornet, Col. Dave Burt, Canada’s director for air requirements, said in a brief Dec. 11 interview with ITAF.

That eventual fighter force structure is expected to be transitioned into the Canadian air force between 2017 and 2020, he added.

However, the chances of Canada fielding a mixed fighter fleet are slim, Burt said, adding that the operation and sustainment costs to field two fighter platforms would be too expensive.

“We will look at all options, but from an affordability perspective, that would create significant challenges,” Burt said. “Having a mixed fleet, in relatively small numbers, would be extremely expensive.”

The more likely option would be to select a single fighter aircraft to fill the country’s requirements, he added.

4 Comments:

Blogger Babbling Brooks said...

The Army dudes want a bomb truck and an air force that is very good at CAS. . .. a la the US Marine's "Air Force".

Yeah, Fred, except that our "Canada First" policy means that we need a fighter-interceptor that can take care of our airspace first and foremost. Any proposal that is monoline CAS will get...heh...shot down pretty damned quick.

9:03 p.m., December 16, 2006  
Blogger Babbling Brooks said...

The army dudes at the very pointy end of the stick deserve that kind of CAS capability.

You're preaching to the choir, Fred. I suspect that organizationally, though, we'll continue to cross-train for every role across all squadrons instead of specializing.

12:03 a.m., December 18, 2006  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Tricky situation for Canada. The F-35 is a single engine fighter which is the only con I can think for this choice. The Typhoon is European and 4.5 generation (not aware of CAS capabilities).... but lets face it, we are buying American. Nobody could afford the F-22 even if it was for sale.... so to me the Super Hornet seems the most likely choice. But in 2017 should we be looking at 4.5 generation aircraft? Too bad Avro isn't around eh?

4:24 a.m., February 19, 2008  
Blogger CompactMotoring said...

JSF is more of a bomber, plus the US govt invested $600 mil in a program to de-stealth a version for export. Which is probably the version they would try to sell to us. So without the stealth, the JSF is really a 4th gen fighter with weaker dog fighting capabilities.

I'd sooner see us go with the Gripin-39's or Rafale's from Dassault, it would never happen but Su-30MKI's with thrust vectoring would be pretty good all around aircraft as well. Typhoons are $122 million according to Wikipedia so I don't think are really in the realm of what Canada wants to spend.

We need a good multi-role fighter. F-18 still is a 30 yr old design, upgrading to 'super' hornets doesn't make sense to me.

1:32 a.m., April 01, 2008  

Post a Comment

<< Home